Preventing a dangerous rise of penny auction sites in MENA

This article is a crosspost with Astrolabs.

This note is meant to outline the danger of penny auction sites and prevent a potentially dangerous rise of these sites in the region.

Executive summary

Penny auction sites are active in the region and should be stopped before they mushroom and take advantage of an online audience that is experiencing e-commerce for the first time. They are deceptive, prey on the online consumer and tarnish the reputation of online-commerce.

In this report, (Previous is taken as a case-study, other sites are emerging to replicate the same model (See section 5).

  1. Background
  2. Deception in Marketing
  3. The auction mechanism itself and indications that many bidders don’t understand it
  4. Attempts at Shielding from responsibility
  5. Risks of spread of the penny auction model in the region
  6. Recommended actions to contain this


Penny auction sites emerged in the U.S. and Europe in the last few years and quickly moved from being pronounced as a “license to print money” by Tech Crunch’s Mike Butcher, to several of the sites shutting down, with others forced to shut down. Some surviving sites such as Madbid continue to get criticized by the press and consumer advocates.

During this period several lawsuits were filed and state and federal regulators in several countries looked into the business practices of these companies, for brevity the following three links are provided as background: Consumer ReportsThe Guardianand (More links at the end of this article)

Deception in marketing

With the auction sites, deception starts at the marketing stage as the marketing messages for these sites deceives the potential customer into thinking that the items are being “SOLD” at very low “PRICES”. However, the reality is that these goods were offered at the shown price after a large number of people lost a significant amount of money bidding on these items with bid prices ranging from US 70 cents (25 bids for USD 17.50) to US 56 cents (625 bids for 2USD 350)

See exhibit 1 for examples of the marketing messages and exhibit 2 for the pricing of the bid packages.

Exhibit 1: Twitter post from, Samples from Closed Auctions section, Sample from Live Auctions section

Twitter Fancy Bid

 Exhibit 2: Bid prices on Purchasing bids is required to participate in the auction.

Bid Prices Fancy Bid

Thus the shown Prada bag (Exhibit 1 , Middle Image,  bottom left Bag) that is marked as SOLD at $88.55 was actually Sold to the bidding public at a price between $4,959 (8855*.56) and $6,199 (8855*.70) PLUS 88.55 since the winner gets to buy it at that “price” Compare this to the stated (and often inflated) retail price of $1,900. The core issue is that in reality this means a group of bidders each spend tens to hundreds of dollars bidding up the counter (what the site calls the “price”) only to have someone outlast them to “win” the right to buy this item at $88.55. This is at best akin to gambling. In fact, it is worse, since for most bidders unless they have armed themselves with a war chest will be guaranteed to lose their money, as compared to gambling where these a statistically minuscule but there still exists a possible change of winning.

The Auction mechanism

Generally, after the auction starts bids start rolling in, but bidders soon realize that it is better to wait until the last moments of the auction to utilize their bids. However, they then discover the never-ending “Ending Now”:

  • The count-down resets back to 15 seconds every time someone makes a bid anytime during the last 15 seconds
  • Very often the counter hits 0, but then 2 or 3 seconds later resets back to the 15 seconds, a tactic used to keep the auction going and is defended in the FAQ .

Exhibit 3: FAQ defense of the auction continuing after the timer runs out

FancyBid FAW

Since the model rests on the frantic bidding at the end of each auction the site focuses on inciting that with posts on social media and emails during those periods.

Exhibit 4: Twitter posts and emails targeted during last part of the auction

Twitter Posts Last Part of Auction

Indication that bidders/players are not fully aware of the mechanism:

  • Bidders outbid themselves in a series of continuous bids: result is the auction time is extended several times giving other bidders a time to recharge
  • Bidders start bidding at the beginning of the auction exhausting their valuable bids although there is no advantage to utilizing bids before the last minutes of an auction.

Attempts to shield from responsibility

The fact that auction sites have been sued and shut down has lead the new crop to defend the model by having an appearance of transparency and awareness.  Adding sections on how the auction ends -Probably the most frustrating element to first time users-  and adding notes in the FAQs about the need to have “enough” bids.

Exhibit 5: bid page summer 2014 and winter 2014 with notifications about bidding end and answer in FAQ addressing the ‘auction’ issue and recommending that users “show caution”

Show Caution

Risks of spread of the penny auction model in the region

The apparent success of Fancybid is leading to other penny auction sites to launch, such as bid affairs, Bidzayed and potentially more (see exhibits 7, 8 & 9). The core weakness of the model is that it relies on first time unsuspecting users and is in constant acquisition mode, as soon as the market has a level of awareness about the operating model the business slows down.

Exhibit 6: A posting requesting a similar site to


Exhibit 7: Domain registration for

Domain Registration

Exhibit 8: Announcement by BlogBaladi about BidAffairs

Announcement About Bid Affairs

 Exhibit 9:  A LinkedIn job post for an auction based ecommerce site (Penny auctions not specified)

Recommended action

Protecting the regional consumers from these sites is needed as they have already been proven to be dangerous an online audience that might fall for their deception.

  • Awareness for the general public: through disseminating articles such as this one and reviews by news sites and blogs across the region
  • Notifying partners of these sites about the dangers of working with them. (Exhibit 10 shows the payment gateway and Design firm currently working with FancyBid)
  • Regulation: regulators in the region, specifically where these websites have their operations should crack down on this predatory model.

Exhibit 10: Partners of FancyBid

Partners of FanceBid

Further reading:

Media categories



Related Articles